
At the end of January 2025, the U.S. government revealed its intention to impose duties on imported computer chips, pharmaceuticals, and steel. This move seeks to strengthen the domestic manufacturing sector and tackle trade imbalances. Nonetheless, these actions may substantially impact international trade relations, especially concerning major U.S. partners in Asia.
In late January 2025, the U.S. administration announced plans to implement tariffs on imported computer chips, pharmaceuticals, and steel. This initiative aims to bolster domestic manufacturing and address trade imbalances. However, such measures could have significant implications for international trade dynamics, particularly affecting key U.S. allies in Asia.
Impact on Semiconductor Industry
The semiconductor sector is poised to be significantly affected by these proposed tariffs. Asia dominates global chip production, accounting for over 80% of the world’s semiconductors. Leading companies such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) and South Korea’s Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix are major suppliers to the U.S. market. For instance, TSMC, the world’s largest contract chipmaker, derives approximately 70% of its revenue from North American clients, including tech giants like Nvidia and Apple. While TSMC is investing in a $65 billion manufacturing facility in Arizona, the majority of its production remains in Taiwan, making it susceptible to the proposed tariffs. Similarly, Samsung and SK Hynix, which together control around 75% of the global DRAM market, could face challenges due to their substantial exports to the U.S.
The pharmaceutical industry is also a key target of the proposed tariffs. Japanese pharmaceutical enterprises, such as Takeda, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, and Eisai, hold considerable interests in the U.S. market. For instance, Takeda noted that more than half of its revenue in the previous fiscal year was generated from the U.S., whereas Astellas mentioned that 41% of its earnings were derived from the U.S. market. Tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals might disrupt their operations and financial outcomes, potentially resulting in higher costs for U.S. consumers.
Steel Industry and Wider Economic Consequences
Applying tariffs on steel imports aims to boost local steel manufacturing. Nevertheless, these actions may cause higher expenses for industries dependent on steel, like the automotive and construction sectors. Increased input costs could lead to higher prices for consumers and possible disruptions in supply chains. Additionally, these tariffs might strain relationships with principal trading partners and trigger retaliatory actions, further complicating global trade relations.
International Trade Ties and Possible Retaliation
The suggested tariffs have raised apprehensions among U.S. allies in Asia. Nations such as Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan, which play crucial roles in the global supply chains for semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, could face economic hurdles due to diminished competitiveness in the U.S. market. These countries might attempt to negotiate exemptions or contemplate imposing retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports, potentially initiating a series of trade conflicts.
National Economic Factors
Domestic Economic Considerations
While the tariffs aim to promote domestic manufacturing, they could have mixed effects on the U.S. economy. Importers are likely to pass increased costs onto consumers, leading to higher prices for goods such as electronics and medications. Additionally, industries dependent on imported components may face challenges in sourcing materials, potentially hindering production and innovation. Economists caution that such protectionist measures could disrupt supply chains and may not yield the intended benefits of job creation in the targeted industries.